DEPARTMENT
OF BIOLOGY
FACULTY
OF SCIENCE & MATHEMATICS
UNIVERSITI
PENDIDIKAN SULTAN IDRIS
SBK3013
PRINCIPLE
IN BIOCHEMISTRY
EXPERIMENT 2: ENZYME
NAME
|
MATRIC NO.
|
MUHAMMAD FARIS BIN ISMAIL SAZEMI
|
D20141067089
|
MAYURIE PHUTHARANT A/P SURIN
|
D20141067078
|
NUR AFIQAH SYAHMINA BT MOHD KAMAL
|
D20141067091
|
GROUP: A
LECTURER’S NAME: DR. ROSMILAH MISNAN
INSTRUCTOR NAME: NUR ATIEKAH BT AZAHARI
INTRODUCTION
The
approach of studying the mechanism of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction is to
determine the changes in response and the rate of the reaction with the changes
of parameters for example substrate concentration, enzyme concentration, pH,
temperature and it is known as enzyme kinetics. Enzymes are protein molecule
that will act as a biological catalyst. Enzyme is functioning to increase the
rate of reactions without changing the overall process.
Enzymes
are chains of amino acids that are bounded together by peptide bonds. In
addition, they can be seen in all living cells and they will help in controlling
the metabolic processes in which they functioned as converter to convert
nutrients into energy and new cells. Furthermore, enzymes also help in the
breakdown of food materials into its simplest form.
The
reactants of enzyme catalysed reactions are termed substrates and each enzyme
is quite specific in character, acting on a particular substrate to produce a
particular products.
MATERIAL AND PROCEDURE
1. Preparation of standard reference
1. Starch solutions were prepared from
the stock solution (1.0 mg/ml) into dilutions of 0.01,
0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0 mg/ml from the starch stock solution.
0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0 mg/ml from the starch stock solution.
2. Mix the starch solution with
distilled water and Iodine Solution.
The mixture for a standard curve were prepared.
The absorbance were measured at 590nm.
5. The following table is used as a
guide.
The Standard
Reference
Test tube
|
8 ml starch of x mg/ml
|
Water (ml)
|
Iodine (ml)
|
Absorbance at 590nm
|
1
|
0
|
9
|
1
|
|
2
|
0.01
|
1
|
1
|
|
3
|
0.025
|
1
|
1
|
|
4
|
0.05
|
1
|
1
|
|
5
|
0.1
|
1
|
1
|
|
6
|
0.3
|
1
|
1
|
|
7
|
0.5
|
1
|
1
|
|
8
|
0.7
|
1
|
1
|
|
9
|
1.0
|
1
|
1
|
6. A standard curve of Absorbance (@
590 nm) vs. concentration of starch/iodine mixture are plotted.
2. Determination the effect of
substrate concentration, temperature and pH on Enzyme velocity
a. The effect of substrate
concentration
Experiment of starch hydrolysis
in different substrate concentration had been prepared as the following table:
Test tube
|
8 ml starch of x mg/ml
|
Water
(ml)
|
Amylase (ml)
|
Incubate each sample at 370C for 10 minutes
|
Iodine
(ml)
|
Place all test tubes in an ice bath. Measure the absorbance at 590nm
|
1
|
0
|
8
|
1
|
1
|
||
2
|
0.01
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
3
|
0.025
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
4
|
0.05
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
5
|
0.1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
6
|
0.3
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
7
|
0.5
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
8
|
0.7
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
9
|
1.0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
b. The effect of temperature
Prepare as the following for the
experiment of different temperature:
Test tube
|
8 ml starch of x mg/ml
|
Water
(ml)
|
Amylase (ml)
|
Incubate each sample at 8, 28, 60, 1000C for 10 minutes
|
Iodine
(ml)
|
Place all test tubes in an ice bath. Measure the absorbance at 590nm
|
1
|
0
|
8
|
1
|
1
|
||
2
|
0.01
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
3
|
0.025
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
4
|
0.05
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
5
|
0.1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
6
|
0.3
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
7
|
0.5
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
8
|
0.7
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
9
|
1.0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
c. The effect of pH
The Effect of pH
Prepare the following for the
experiment using different pH:
Test tube
|
Starch of 0.5 mg/ml
|
2 ml buffer of pH x
|
Amylase (ml)
|
Incubate each sample at 370C for 10 minutes
|
Iodine
(ml)
|
Place all test tubes in an ice bath. Measure the absorbance at 590nm
|
1
|
5
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
||
2
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
||
3
|
5
|
6
|
1
|
1
|
||
4
|
5
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
||
5
|
5
|
8
|
1
|
1
|
||
6
|
5
|
9
|
1
|
1
|
||
7
|
5
|
10
|
1
|
1
|
||
Blank
|
5
|
8 ml of dH2O
|
1
|
RESULT
1. Standard reference
1. Determination the effect of substrate concentration, temperature and pH
on Enzyme velocity
a. The effect of substrate concentration
S0
|
Sf
|
V=
|
1/S0
|
1/V
|
||
Absorbance
|
Standard
curve
|
|||||
0.00
|
0.182
|
0.010
|
0.010
|
0.0010
|
0.00
|
1000.00
|
0.01
|
0.147
|
0.005
|
0.005
|
0.0005
|
100.00
|
2000.00
|
0.025
|
0.208
|
0.010
|
0.015
|
0.0015
|
40.00
|
666.67
|
0.05
|
0.239
|
0.015
|
0.035
|
0.0035
|
20.00
|
285.71
|
0.10
|
0.222
|
0.010
|
0.090
|
0.0090
|
10.00
|
111.11
|
0.30
|
0.231
|
0.015
|
0.285
|
0.0285
|
3.33
|
35.09
|
0.50
|
0.155
|
0.005
|
0.495
|
0.0495
|
2.00
|
20.20
|
0.70
|
0.229
|
0.015
|
0.885
|
0.0885
|
1.43
|
11.30
|
1.00
|
0.251
|
0.020
|
0.980
|
0.0980
|
1.00
|
10.20
|
Michaelis-Menten Plot:
Vmax = 0.099 mg/ml
min
Vmax/2 = 0.0495 mg/ml
min
Km = 0.24 mg/ml
Lineweaver-Burke Plot:
1/Vmax = 60 (mg/ml
min)-1
Vmax = 0.017 mg/ml
min
-1/ Km =- 4 (mg/ml)-1
Km = 0.25 mg/ml
a. The effect of temperature
8ºC
S0 (mg/ml)
|
Sf (mg/ml)
|
ΔS (mg/ml)
|
V=ΔS/t
(mg/ml)/m
|
1/S0 (mg/ml)-1
|
1/V
(mg/ml
|
|
Standard
curve
|
Absorbance
at 560 nm
|
|||||
0
|
0.140
|
1.180
|
-0.140
|
-0.0140
|
0
|
-71.43
|
0.010
|
0.145
|
1.200
|
-0.135
|
-0.0135
|
100.0
|
-74.07
|
0.025
|
0.146
|
1.203
|
-0.121
|
0.0121
|
40.0
|
-82.64
|
0.050
|
0.230
|
1.921
|
-0.180
|
-0.018
|
20.0
|
-55.56
|
0.10
|
0.147
|
1.227
|
-0.047
|
-0.0047
|
10.0
|
-212.77
|
0.30
|
0.150
|
1.244
|
0.150
|
0.015
|
3.33
|
66.67
|
0.50
|
0.151
|
1.253
|
0.349
|
0.0349
|
2.00
|
28.65
|
0.70
|
0.145
|
1.214
|
0.555
|
0.0555
|
1.43
|
18.02
|
01.0
|
0.133
|
1.142
|
0.867
|
0.0867
|
1.00
|
11.53
|
28ºC
S0 (mg/ml)
|
Sf (mg/ml)
|
ΔS (mg/ml)
|
V=ΔS/t
(mg/ml)/m
|
1/S0 (mg/ml)-1
|
1/V
(mg/ml
|
|
Standard
curve
|
Absorbance
at 560 nm
|
|||||
0
|
0.145
|
1.208
|
-0.145
|
-0.0145
|
0
|
-68.97
|
0.010
|
0.130
|
1.070
|
-0.120
|
-0.012
|
100.0
|
-83.33
|
0.025
|
0.116
|
0.971
|
-0.091
|
-0.0091
|
40.0
|
-109.90
|
0.050
|
0.115
|
0.964
|
-0.065
|
-0.0065
|
20.0
|
-153.85
|
0.10
|
0.120
|
1.036
|
-0.020
|
-0.0020
|
10.0
|
-500.00
|
0.30
|
0.147
|
1.234
|
0.153
|
0.0153
|
3.33
|
65.36
|
0.50
|
0.161
|
1.382
|
0.339
|
0.0339
|
2.00
|
29.50
|
0.70
|
0.128
|
1.068
|
0.572
|
0.0572
|
1.43
|
17.48
|
01.0
|
0.135
|
1.156
|
0.865
|
0.0865
|
1.00
|
11.56
|
60ºC
S0
|
Sf
|
ΔS
|
V=ΔS/t
|
1/S0
|
1/V
|
|
Absorbance
|
Standard
curve
|
|||||
0
|
1.385
|
0.165
|
0.165
|
0.0165
|
0
|
60.61
|
0.01
|
0.623
|
0.072
|
0.062
|
6.2x10-3
|
100
|
161.3
|
0.025
|
1.019
|
0.063
|
0.038
|
3.8x10-3
|
40
|
263.2
|
0.05
|
0.844
|
0.1
|
0.500
|
0.05
|
20
|
20.0
|
0.1
|
1.215
|
0.145
|
0.045
|
4.5x10-3
|
10
|
222.2
|
0.3
|
1.570
|
0.183
|
0.117
|
0.0117
|
3.33
|
85.47
|
0.5
|
1.943
|
0.23
|
0.270
|
0.027
|
2
|
37.03
|
0.7
|
2.050
|
0.243
|
0.457
|
0.0457
|
1.43
|
21.88
|
1.0
|
0.627
|
0.077
|
0.923
|
0.0923
|
1
|
10.83
|
100ºC
S0
|
Sf
|
ΔS
|
V=ΔS/t
|
1/S0
|
1/V
|
|
Absorbance
|
Standard
curve
|
|||||
0
|
0.359
|
0.030
|
0.030
|
3.3X10-3
|
0
|
303.03
|
0.01
|
0.470
|
0.050
|
0.04
|
4.0X10-3
|
100
|
250
|
0.025
|
2.085
|
0.25
|
0.225
|
0.0225
|
40
|
44.44
|
0.05
|
2.675
|
0.32
|
0.27
|
0.0270
|
20
|
37.04
|
0.1
|
0.440
|
0.043
|
0.057
|
5.7X10-3
|
10
|
175.44
|
0.3
|
0.450
|
0.047
|
0.253
|
0.0253
|
3.33
|
39.53
|
0.5
|
0.520
|
0.055
|
0.445
|
0.0445
|
2
|
22.47
|
0.7
|
0.563
|
0.062
|
0.638
|
0.0638
|
1.43
|
15.67
|
1.0
|
0.504
|
0.058
|
0.942
|
0.0942
|
1
|
10.62
|
Calculation for Km and Vmax for each temperature
Temperature
(*C)
|
Km
(mg/mol)
|
Vmax
(mg/mol.min)
|
8
|
0.250
|
0.057
|
28
|
0.125
|
0.057
|
60
|
0.083
|
0.057
|
100
|
0.0417
|
0.057
|
a. The effect
of pH
pH
|
So
|
Sf
|
∆s = So -
Sf
|
V= ∆s/t
|
|
absorbance
|
Standard
curve
|
||||
4
|
0.5
|
2.099
|
0.45
|
0.050
|
0.005
|
5
|
0.5
|
0.362
|
0.04
|
0.460
|
0.046
|
6
|
0.5
|
0.256
|
0.01
|
0.490
|
0.049
|
7
|
0.5
|
0.254
|
0.005
|
0.495
|
0.0495
|
8
|
0.5
|
0.223
|
0
|
0.5
|
0.05
|
9
|
0.5
|
0.241
|
0
|
0.5
|
0.05
|
10
|
0.5
|
0.278
|
0.015
|
0.485
|
0.0485
|
Blank
|
0.5
|
0.085
|
0
|
0.5
|
0.05
|
DISCUSSION
The
effect of substrate concentration
As
the concentration of substrate increases, the rate of reaction also increases
until the point saturation occurs. It means as you increase the concentration,
rate keeps increasing and then one point comes when the maximum rate is
achieved and there is no free enzyme to bind with substrate and all the active
sites of enzyme are bound to the substrate. So after that point, increasing the
concentration won’t have any effect. What is the maximum for each enzyme is
usually given by Km value (Michealis Menten graph or the other
one called something like Lineweaver burke plot). However, at some point, the
graph shows that increasing the amount of substrate does not increase the
reaction rate. We call this Vmax or the maximum velocity of
reaction.
Our
experiment is accordance to the theory. This is because, from the test tube 2
until 9 (there are no starch is the first test tube), the value for V=
S/t
is increase from 0.0050, 0.0015, 0.0035, 0.0090, 0.0285, 0.0495, 0.0885, 0.0980
respectively. The value for V=
S/t
indicate velocity (rate of digestion) of the reaction for each sample. When the
substrate concentration change and while enzyme concentration is keeps
constant, the rate of reaction will increase.
The
effect of temperature
Based on the plotted graph, the line for 8°C has the Km value of 0.250. The
line for 28°C has the Km value of 0.125. The line for 60°C has Km value of
0.083 while the Km value for 100°C is 0.0417. Theoretically, the lower the Km
value, the higher the affinity to the substrate. As a result, the rate of
reaction is greater. According to the three different temperatures applied,
temperature of 100°C is the optimum temperature for the enzyme to react as its
Km value is the lowest among all. On the other hand, the lines share the same
Vmax value, which is 0.057. Although temperatures change, the active site does
not change. The substrates can still bind with the enzyme. The only difference
is the rate of reaction.
The
purpose was to study the effect of temperature of enzyme functioning. The major
finding was that at 100°C the amylase broke down the starch the fastest. The
other temperatures (8°C, 28°C, 60°C) didn’t break down starch until 10 minutes
while 100°C broke down starch in 5 minutes. Our hypothesis, if amylase is used
at 37°C, then it would more effectively to break down starch than amylase at
any other temperature, was not supported. The unexpected result was that 100°C
was more effective to break down starch.
The
effect of pH
pH
can give several effect on structure and activity of an enzyme. For example, pH
can have an effect of the state of ionization of acidic or basic amino acids.
Acidic amino acids have carboxyl functional groups in their side chains. Basic
amino acids have amine functional groups in their side chains. If the state of
ionization of amino acids in a protein is altered then the ionic bonds that
help to determine the 3-D shape of the protein can be altered. This can lead to
altered protein recognition or an enzyme might become inactive.
Changes
in pH may not only affect the shape of an enzyme but it may also change the
shape or charge properties of the substrate so that either the substrate cannot
bind to the active site or it cannot undergo catalysis.
The
most favorable pH value - the point where the enzyme is most active - is known
as the optimum pH.
The
velocity of pH is increased from pH 4 to 8. The velocity for each pH from pH 4,
5, 6, 7 and 8 is 0.005, 0.046, 0.049, 0.0495 0.05. But starting from pH 8 and
9, the velocity is the same that is 0.05 and the velocity to become lower at pH
10.
It
is important to study the effect of pH on enzyme activity so it can be learned
when amylase will function with maximun efficiency. In this experiment, the
effect of seven different pH’s ( 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0 and 10.0) on the
efficiency of an amylase reaction is studied. We tested in order to study the
general pattern of an enzyme efficiency as a result of the pH environment.
Theoretically, the optimal pH will be 7.0 because amylase is generally found in
saliva of many animals, and it would therefore make sense for the enzyme to
function best at the typical pH of those organisms, which is around 7.0, then
the rate of disappearance would be greater than that of the reaction
occuring in the solution with pH 6.0 or pH 10.0. In the experiment that we had
done, the result that we obtained is the pH that work best for amylase is pH 8
and it is slightly differences with the theoretical value for pH that work best
for amylase that is pH 7. This maybe due to the error that we had done during
the experiment such as we put too much of buffer solution in the test tubes.
CONCLUSION
Based on our experiment,
some of the results are not the same as the theory. For the substrate
concentration, as the concentration increase the rate of enzymatic reaction.
The obtained result is same as from the expected. As for the temperature, the
rate of reaction increase gradually as the temperature increase. For the effect
of pH, the most favorable pH value for amylase is pH 8 and 9.
REFERENCES
Analyzing Enzyme Kinetic Data with a
Graphing Calculator. Retrieved on 1 May, 2013 from
http://dwb.unl.edu/calculators/pdf/Enzyme-Calc.pdf
Anonymous, Effect of pH on enzyme.
Retrieved on April 28, 2013from
http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/biology/bio4fv/page/ph_and_.htm
Wise Geek (2013). What Is Substrate
Concentration? Retrieved on May 1, 2013 from
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-substrate-concentration.htm
Worthington Biochemical Corporation
(2013). Introduction to enzyme. Retrieved on April 28 2013 from
http://www.worthington-biochem.com/introbiochem/effectsph.html
No comments:
Post a Comment